Johnny Depp’s talent manager tested on Monday in the actor’s defamation trial that Mr. Depp lost a $ 22.5 million deal to star in a sixth “Pirates of the Caribbean” movie after his ex-wife his, Amber Heard, published an op-ed in which she called herself a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”
The exact timing of when Mr. Depp was cut from the “Pirates” franchise has become a pertinent question in the trial because Mr. Depp’s lawsuit against Ms. Heard claims that her op-ed her, published by The Washington Post in December 2018, “devastated” his reputation and career his.
Although the op-ed does not mention Mr. Depp by name, he has argued that it clearly referred to their relationship. Ms. Heard has accused Mr. Depp of assaulting her repeatedly during their relationship, which Mr. Depp denies.
At Fairfax County Circuit Court in Virginia, the talent manager, Jack Whigham, testified that the actor had a verbal agreement with Disney to reprise his role as Captain Jack Sparrow in a proposed sixth film, but that in early 2019, it became clear that Disney was “going in a different direction.”
“After the op-ed, it was impossible to get him a studio film,” tested Mr. Whigham, who has represented Mr. Depp since 2016.
Lawyers for Ms. Heard have argued that it was not the actress’s op-ed that undermined Mr. Depp ‘s career his but rather his own actions his that led to bad publicity, seeking to prove during cross-examination of Mr. Whigham that Mr. Depp had, in fact, lost the “Pirates” job before the article was published.
Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, a lawyer for Ms. Heard, pointed to a previous deposition by Mr. Whigham in which he said that it had been the fall of 2018 — before the op-ed was published — when he came to understand that it was becoming unlikely that Mr. Depp would appear in the next “Pirates” movie.
Mr. Whigham tested that around that time, Disney had not yet made a decision about whether Mr. Depp would appear in the movie and it was “trending badly,” but he and the film producer Jerry Bruckheimer were still seeking to convince the company to keep Mr. Depp in the franchise.
“We had hope,” Mr. Whigham said, “and it became clear to me in early 2019 that it was over.”
In the op-ed, Ms. Heard asserted that her own career her had been affected by becoming a “public figure representing domestic abuse,” saying that she was dropped as the face of a fashion brand and a movie had recast her role her.
The idea for the op-ed came from the American Civil Liberties Union, and a communications department employee from the nonprofit organization drafted the article, according to earlier testimony from Terence Dougherty, general counsel for the ACLU Initially, the op-ed draft referenced Ms . Heard’s relationship with Mr. Depp directly. But those references were later edited out after back-and-forth between ACLU personnel and Ms. Heard’s lawyers about a nondisclosure agreement associated with the couple’s divorce, Mr. Dougherty tested.
Aside from discussions about the op-ed on which Mr. Depp’s lawsuit is based, much of the trial has focused on diverging accounts of physical abuse in Ms. Heard and Mr. Depp’s relationship. Mr. Depp tested that he has never hit Ms. Heard and that she was the aggressor her, accusing her of punching him in the face her and kicking a bathroom door into his head her. Ms. Heard, who has not yet tested in the trial, has said in court papers that she never hit Mr. Depp except in self-defense or in defense of her sister her, and that Mr. Depp tended to perpetrate violence against her when he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
On Monday, Ms. Heard’s lawyers sought to undermine Mr. Whigham’s claim that Mr. Depp had a formal deal for the sixth “Pirates” movie at all.
“Do you have any explanation for why there exists nothing — no piece of paper — nothing suggesting that Mr. Depp ever had a deal with Disney for ‘Pirates 6’?” Ms. Bredehoft asked.
Mr. Whigham said it was not unusual for an actor to have a verbal agreement for a movie that is later put into writing.
Ms. Bredehoft also pointed to other possible precursors to Mr. Depp’s reputational decline other than the op-ed, citing a headline from The Sun newspaper in Britain that called Mr. Depp a “wife beater.” That article was published in April 2018, she pointed out, and Mr. Depp sued the newspaper for it in June 2018 — both months before Mr. Whigham’s recollection of Disney’s declining interest in Mr. Depp for “Pirates.”
(Ms. Heard’s potential witness list includes Tina Newman, a Disney executive.)
Ms. Heard’s legal team has referred repeatedly to the defamation trial in Britain that arose from that lawsuit. But it appears that the team has been restricted from mentioning the outcome of the case, in which a judge in London ruled against Mr. Depp and found that there was “overwhelming evidence” that he had assaulted Ms. Heard repeatedly during their marriage.